Preserving replication packages#
Public replication packages are preserved by journals or trusted archives.
What to do with the confidential data?
Replication package as a puzzle#

Treat the full replication package as a puzzle:
The public package (
A) is one piece, containing code, public data, and documentationThe confidential data (
B) is the missing piece that completes the picture, and stays in the RDC
Releasing the public package#
The public package (A) will contain all data that can be made public, and all code.
README.md
README.pdf
code/
fsrdc/
01-prepare-data.R
02-analyze-data.R
03-create-disclosable-data.R
public/
04-create-tables.do
05-create-figures.do
06-create-intext.do
run.sh
data/
public/
dist_cepii.dta
usa_00010.dta
Preserve the confidential data that you created#
intermediate outputs
confidential final files
confidential parameters
The confidential package (B), which stays in the RDC, will contain only those pieces that are confidential.
README.md
README.pdf
code/
confidential/
conf-parms.R
data/
confidential/
lbd_2001.dta
icf_2024.dta
Replicators can combine both#
unzip A.zip -d replication-of-lars/
unzip B.zip -d replication-of-lars/
Preservation inside the RDC#
As in the Fort package, leverage internal backup procedures
Some RDCs may also have an explicit preservation policy (to comply with public access laws?)
The likely retention period (or lack thereof) must be noted in the (public) README.
Information on how to find the confidential
B.zipmust be included in the public README.